<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the Disciple Jesus Loved: A case for it being Mary Magdalene (I of II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stormtiger.com/collie/bestiary/2008/12/thoughts-on-the-disciple-jesus-loved-a-case-for-it-being-mary-magdalene-i-of-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stormtiger.com/collie/bestiary/2008/12/thoughts-on-the-disciple-jesus-loved-a-case-for-it-being-mary-magdalene-i-of-ii/</link>
	<description>Another mythologizing animal sharing a spark of intellectual passion!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:12:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.stormtiger.com/collie/bestiary/2008/12/thoughts-on-the-disciple-jesus-loved-a-case-for-it-being-mary-magdalene-i-of-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-21325</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormtiger.com/collie/bestiary/?p=73#comment-21325</guid>
		<description>Very interesting site, Hope it will always be alive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting site, Hope it will always be alive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.stormtiger.com/collie/bestiary/2008/12/thoughts-on-the-disciple-jesus-loved-a-case-for-it-being-mary-magdalene-i-of-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-20799</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 04:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormtiger.com/collie/bestiary/?p=73#comment-20799</guid>
		<description>I know it is true what you have written here.  

Anything can be altered due to translations but the writings plus knowledge we now have of the culture in those days is undeniable evidence in my view.  

The two did love each other but in those days it was not sexual as today&#039;s times.  It was a spiritual love - today&#039;s people sometimes have a hard time understanding this.  

At the cross, Jesus wanted Mary to take his place to help his mother.  She did help her, and then traveled out of the area, where Jesus&#039; friends were being suppressed - to a cave in France - out of the way of everyone.   There she made a home and a safe place for other people of good will to come and write. 

She did author some of the writings as well as hiding them in various caves so they would not be destroyed.  There were many duplicates so that if some were found and destroyed, there would still be more and the knowledge would not be lost to future generations.  

This is just an opinion based upon a little knowledge of the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it is true what you have written here.  </p>
<p>Anything can be altered due to translations but the writings plus knowledge we now have of the culture in those days is undeniable evidence in my view.  </p>
<p>The two did love each other but in those days it was not sexual as today&#039;s times.  It was a spiritual love &#8211; today&#039;s people sometimes have a hard time understanding this.  </p>
<p>At the cross, Jesus wanted Mary to take his place to help his mother.  She did help her, and then traveled out of the area, where Jesus&#039; friends were being suppressed &#8211; to a cave in France &#8211; out of the way of everyone.   There she made a home and a safe place for other people of good will to come and write. </p>
<p>She did author some of the writings as well as hiding them in various caves so they would not be destroyed.  There were many duplicates so that if some were found and destroyed, there would still be more and the knowledge would not be lost to future generations.  </p>
<p>This is just an opinion based upon a little knowledge of the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.stormtiger.com/collie/bestiary/2008/12/thoughts-on-the-disciple-jesus-loved-a-case-for-it-being-mary-magdalene-i-of-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18512</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stormtiger.com/collie/bestiary/?p=73#comment-18512</guid>
		<description>The evidence in the plain text of scripture easily disproves the notion that Mary Magdalene was the disciple whom Jesus loved. Feel free to check out the Bible study at:

http://the-beloved-disciple.com/mary_magdalene_fourth_gospel_author/

but only if you care to subject your hypothesis to Biblical scrutiny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The evidence in the plain text of scripture easily disproves the notion that Mary Magdalene was the disciple whom Jesus loved. Feel free to check out the Bible study at:</p>
<p><a href="http://the-beloved-disciple.com/mary_magdalene_fourth_gospel_author/" rel="nofollow">http://the-beloved-disciple.com/mary_magdalene_fourth_gospel_author/</a></p>
<p>but only if you care to subject your hypothesis to Biblical scrutiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
