{"id":1589,"date":"2010-02-10T00:02:36","date_gmt":"2010-02-10T07:02:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/?p=1589"},"modified":"2010-07-20T08:17:51","modified_gmt":"2010-07-20T15:17:51","slug":"a-redux-on-how-do-we-keep-honesty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/2010\/02\/a-redux-on-how-do-we-keep-honesty\/","title":{"rendered":"A Redux on &#8220;How do we Keep Honesty?&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This month&#8217;s <i>Firestarter<\/i> is a (badly needed) review and reflection on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/2008\/08\/how-do-we-keep-honesty-part-i\/\">How Do We Keep Honesty?<\/a> I figured since February is traditionally a month for love, this time I&#8217;d attempt to achieve love of self, and gently engage in some internal reflection &#8212; always a scary proposition. :-) Fair warning: this <i>Firestarter<\/i> will make the most sense if you either re-read the original article, or open it in a window next to this one, as I did.<\/p>\n<p>I suppose my internal reluctance to address my previous <i>Firestarter<\/i> on honesty is due to my recognizing that, from my very starting paragraphs, it&#8217;s clear my philosophical beliefs have not actually withstood the test of reality. Did I realize my personal ambivalence even then, as I set up the (rather melodramatic, in parts) parameters under which I&#8217;d be operating while writing? I&#8217;m not sure; I&#8217;d guess not, since I think I wove some unwitting personal dishonesty right into the <i>Firestarter<\/i> as I wrote it. How embarrassing. Still, at least I&#8217;ve attempted repeating the &#8220;experiment&#8221; &#8212; or rather, the questions I was asking myself then. Unsurprising, I guess, that I got somewhat different results this time.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m afraid my definitions in the <i>Firestarter<\/i> are rather simplistically self-righteous. What I was attempting to do in the original was to define truth for myself &#8212; but I deliberately conflated &#8220;not lying&#8221; with truth, and I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s either fair or valid. I also tried to force courtesy (a personal favorite) into the definition of truth, which emphatically does not work. As a single example, it may be wrong to betray someone in order to always speak truth &#8212; but even though it is discourteous, that does not automatically make the betraying statement a lie. It just makes it rude.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/collie\/img\/articles\/crossedfingers.jpg\" vspace=\"6\" hspace=\"6\"\/>Interestingly, I have not explored the entire concept of considerate silence at all; was I so excitably verbal then that it just never occurred to me? It&#8217;s a fine line, again: if I&#8217;ve not been asked for my opinion, my silence will not harm my companion, and speaking up may in fact harm them&#8230; is a considerate silence truly deceptive? I&#8217;m inclined to think not. Upon reflection, I&#8217;m also not sure I can state all deliberate silence, when it may well harm another, is a lie, per se. A deception perhaps, and possibly wrong? Sure. But is a lie always only spoken? How do we more precisely define deception and lies, when being deceived is so fraught with emotions such as pain and fear? No one I know of really wants to be hurt and\/or lied to, after all.<\/p>\n<p>Further, where do you draw the line between thoughtfully considerate silence, and malicious honesty &#8212; when you can&#8217;t see the other person&#8217;s thoughts? What if they were silent not to give a false impression, but rather because they didn&#8217;t want to hurt your feelings? I don&#8217;t even consider those possibilities; I just label them falsehood by inference. Perhaps I would be better off to simply suggest the tried-but-true old chestnut of doing unto others what you believe they wish done to them. <\/p>\n<p>In regard to hurt feelings, I think that&#8217;s another fine line: is it better to be always (if painfully) honest &#8212; or to always (even if deceptively) avoid hurting folks? Personally, I&#8217;d rather be unhappy for a short period due to painful but truly well-meant honesty &#8212; than wandering around in ignorance of some stupid thing I was doing wrong. I guess my personal dividing line becomes: in the long run, do I think <i>they<\/i> would rather know the something that might hurt their feelings? Also, would <i>I<\/i> feel betrayed if I weren&#8217;t told, in their situation? <\/p>\n<p>In regards to my blithe assumption that breaches of trust are tantamount to lying, clearly I&#8217;ve not defined &#8220;promoting falsehood&#8221; well enough to show how this counts as a lie or deception as well. I don&#8217;t quite know how someone would protect themselves against <a href=\"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/2008\/08\/how-do-we-keep-honesty-part-ii\/\">the examples Eric gave<\/a>, though, aside from simply using care in choosing friends. I do feel, for example, there needs to be trust between friends &#8212; I don&#8217;t believe I should have to list all the possible means of communication when I ask them not to repeat my words. Equally, if I choose to share personal information unwisely, I&#8217;d have to say it&#8217;s as much my foolishness at fault, as it is their betrayal of my trust. Ah, I can see my wistful thinking then: if only it were <i>easy<\/i> to determine trustworthiness! :-)<\/p>\n<p>Re-reading, I have to laugh at my &#8220;Does this make me look fat?&#8221; example. Did I not realize my original suggestion was indeed deceptive? Shame on me. All right, let me think &#8212; what would be an honest, non-deceptive response? Perhaps something courteous but also truthful: &#8220;Hmm&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure that [<i>name of piece of clothing<\/i>] is right for you,&#8221; followed by something like offering them a different piece, &#8220;Try this &#8212; it will really bring out the color of your eyes,&#8221; or &#8220;You looked so much nicer in this piece here.&#8221; That allows you to both be courteous, and give them a bit of positive affirmation. Of course, there&#8217;s always humor as well: laugh and say, &#8220;I&#8217;m not going to answer that question! That&#8217;s the Question of DOOM &#8212; and you know it!&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Regarding Issue II, about the self-deceptive person: Good <i>heavens<\/i> but I dance around the issue self-righteously! I need to come right out and say what I truly mean; I&#8217;m right on the edge of self-deception myself, there. So someone is perhaps self-deceptive &#8212; what skin is that off my nose? It&#8217;s not my responsibility to smugly lead them to &#8220;my&#8221; all-hallowed Truth, especially since I doubt I know it any better than they &#8212; or that I&#8217;m any more free from self-deception.<\/p>\n<p>Further, do the avoidance techniques I list really have anything to do with <i>my<\/i> keeping honesty? Instead of whining about these people, I suspect I should rather be searching internally for what I can learn from them. It&#8217;s always easier, after all, to point at someone <i>else&#8217;s<\/i> supposed issues&#8230; so as to not look within. I should be keenly aware of my own psychological projections in that situation &#8212; especially since, as Jung once famously noted, &#8220;Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Moving along to <a href=\"\/collie\/bestiary\/2008\/08\/how-do-we-keep-honesty-part-iv\/\">part IV<\/a>&#8230; while my caveat re disagreement not equating to being wrong is a good one, my example of creationists seriously weakens my argument. Worse, I&#8217;m thereby indirectly patting myself on the back for my &#8220;lack of self-delusion&#8221; and &#8220;sensitivity.&#8221; I need to grow up a little there.<\/p>\n<p>Further, I should have differentiated more thoughtfully. After all, there are self-named creationists who believe god created evolution, which I think is an elegant spiritual solution to smoothly mating religion and science&#8230; and then there are those creationists who believe the earth is flat and dinosaur bones were put there by demons to tempt us from the path of godly righteousness. It&#8217;s not fair to lump them all together just for the sake of &#8220;winning&#8221; my own simplistic argument.<\/p>\n<p>I notice an amusingly naive assumption in my conclusion: I state if someone has an absolute belief system that is non-self-deceptive, they are &#8220;trying their best.&#8221; However\u2026 how do we know they&#8217;re not lying to <i>us<\/i> about the nature of their belief system? How can we tell if it is entirely non-self-deceptive? Perhaps I should extend the courtesy of assuming someone is &#8220;trying their best&#8221; to everyone &#8212; including myself.<\/p>\n<p>Ian&#8217;s caveat regarding <i>not<\/i> always accepting reasoned debate is a beautiful example of my own arrogant assumptions, as well &#8212; thank you, Ian, for the wake-up call there. Ian&#8217;s suggestion on personal reflection first is excellent; I wonder if writing one&#8217;s thoughts out would work as well, such as I am doing here. Upon reflection, I see I&#8217;ve been effectively trying to implement his suggestion these past few years &#8212; good.<\/p>\n<p>So&#8230; am I keeping honesty? I hope so, although I can&#8217;t really say for sure. I&#8217;ve been more occupied, for the past few years, in trying to improve my personal self-awareness&#8230; rather than stridently insisting other people need to change their behavior for me. I do know that, like Michelangelo, &#8220;still I am learning&#8221; &#8212; and I intend to continue doing so for as long as possible. That will have to do, I suppose. :-)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This month&#8217;s Firestarter is a (badly needed) review and reflection on How Do We Keep Honesty? I figured since February is traditionally a month for&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,5,1,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-firestarter","category-ethics-questions","category-uncategorized","category-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1589"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1589\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1591,"href":"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1589\/revisions\/1591"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stormtiger.com\/collie\/bestiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}